|
Post by Premier Edition on Jun 30, 2005 6:44:02 GMT -5
Of course they both know the risk. But no way are they on equal ground. Unless of course the father agree to carry the child for a least half the time in his abdomen. Equal? The father takes no health risk nor is his body changed. But he knew the risk to begin with. In my opinion he should have no say so now. Unless of course the mother agrees. Im not going around in circles. But because you are so dense I do end up repeating myself. You are the only thing making me dizzy.
|
|
|
Post by Big Foot on Jun 30, 2005 13:33:45 GMT -5
;D Your so dizy your head is spinning..... Remember the song Mr. Premier? It does not matter if the man can carry the child or not ! It's not his fault that he is not built that way. Lucky of course I would say. But this should in no way infringe on the rights that should be afforded to him. I will now repeat myself, as you do so many times. The mother and father should both be held responsible for their actions and share in this responsibility. One nor the other should have more rights then the other, just because their anatomy is not structured in the same manner. Again, this dose not give neither one, man or female the right to murder a unborn child !
|
|
|
Post by Premier Edition on Jul 1, 2005 8:21:12 GMT -5
The is the last time I will answer the questions that you keep repeating. Both start out with same responsibility, or should I say, irresponsibility. But unless an agreement was reached prior, the father does not gain say so over the mothers body. Your position sames to be that even though they both start out equal, the mothers looses rights if the father steps up. My position is. That if the father did not step up before the act, then he just needs to sit his ass down.
|
|
|
Post by Big Foot on Jul 1, 2005 9:56:03 GMT -5
Boy oh boy oh boy Premier, The agreement as you so chose to use the term, was reached prior to the act. Unless the father raped the mother to be. The ageement took hold when it was agreeable between the both to have sex.
|
|
|
Post by Premier Edition on Jul 2, 2005 8:08:12 GMT -5
Sell that one to spin city. The agreement was to have unprotected sex. Unless the father and mother make an agreement concerning what should happen should there be a child. Then the father need not say anything post conception.
|
|
|
Post by Big Foot on Jul 2, 2005 11:37:57 GMT -5
Still waiting on confirmation if I should make a reply. Lol
|
|
|
Post by sampitprincess on Mar 26, 2007 21:49:02 GMT -5
First of all, let me start by saying that I myself would never have an abortion.. But i don't feel that the Government has the right to tell someone what they can or cannot do with their own bodies.. Their are several reasons why a person would have an abortion..So therefore, I don't think that someone should judge another person until they walk a mile in that persons shoes!
|
|
Wade
Lt. General
Posts: 35
|
Post by Wade on Mar 27, 2007 8:27:15 GMT -5
Sampitprincess, I agree with both you and Premier Edition. I am against abortion. But I am just as much against the government legislating us to death. I am still not clear as to Big Foots position. Sames like he was saying, that once the woman was pregnant, it was now up to the government and the father, as to what happens.
|
|